Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Product Ponderings

A product generally lists its name, model and some special features. Whereas the product packaging has the brand name, some graphics, contents, material used to manufacture, place of manufacture and other sundry details required by regulation. That is for the regulated products like Medicines, food products etc.

 

Say, for example, a computer/PC will list the brand name (say, Dell), the model name (Optiplex 360), special features (Intel Core™ 2 Duo inside™) and such.

 

I wanted to present in this space a product that lists all these and more. So here goes!

 

Brand Name: Esteam (No that is not a spelling mistake for Esteem, it is an intended variation to keep in accord with the product being sold)

Company Name: AVCON™

Model: Splendour-3

 

Apart from these details, this product that I bought a few weeks ago proclaims the following:

Strong and Sturdy – right!

Lasts a lifetime – I will die, but it will go on!

Made of quality stainless steel – Of course it is!

Click Lock – Awesome!

Easy to clean – That's really required!

P. U. insulated – That's Poly Urethane Insulated – Real cool tech.

First time in India - Now we all love that, don't we?

 

Now you guys are given here a chance to take a guess at what this product is. I will give you all a chance for one week. Then will update the post with the right answer.

 

Terms and conditions: This quiz is not open to family members living with the poster

Monday, June 15, 2009

Cricket Musings

Yesterday night the Indian cricket team, the defending champions of the T20 world cup, was eliminated rather unceremoniously from the event. I was awake when the cookie crumbled to show the ugly reality within it. I decided yesterday night never, from here on, to forego sleep for such stupid events. Many of my friends will be pointing their fingers in an "I told you so!" fashion.

 

In the after effect, after the event, I began analyzing the team's defeat. I am not an expert, but as an Indian cricket fan have the highest qualification to be a critic. The side that played yesterday was so shoddy, it was appalling. Let's go by the batting order.

 

Gautam Gambhir – The only role he plays is of an opening batsman. He is good but is not in touch. As a fielder he is always on the fringes, very rarely making spectacular stops or taking stupendous catches. So he can be termed as not an all-rounder.

 

Rohit Sharma – He had a great IPL tour. But in the absence of Sehwag, pushed into opening, he has failed to deliver when it mattered most. Both his shots in the super eight games were played early, he has to slow down a little I guess. He is a good fielder. But nobody gets into the team only as a fielder.

 

Suresh Raina – Brutally exposed of his lack of technique at playing the short ball, Suresh Raina also is in the team as a fielder. As mentioned earlier, nobody gets into the team only as a fielder.

 

Ravindra Jadeja – He bowled well, but his batting leaves a lot to be desired. I have never seen a batsman hit so many shots and not clearing the ground. He is too young. He could have been what Yuvraj Singh was at his age, but he is not a Punjabi, thus lacking the power and strength to clear the boundary.

 

Yuvraj Singh – Gone are the days when batsmen feared to run when the ball was in his vicinity. Now they even dare think of taking twos near him. He was the culprit who failed to collect a wide ball fired in by harbhajan, giving away 5 wides off a ball that could have easily been only 2 runs. India lost the match by 3 runs. He is only in the team as a dangerous batsman. He doesn't bowl enough to be called an all rounder anymore.

 

M. S. Dhoni – The slated wicket-keeper batsman can be considered as an all-rounder, but with a missed stumping and 10 wides let go off Harbhajan Singh, he seems to be in the team only as a Captain. His scores aren't up to scratch either.

 

Yusuf Pathan – A bits an pieces player who can tonk the ball hard, been playing too low in the batting order to get a decent hit in. Bowls pretty well even in the 'power play' overs.

 

Harbhajan Singh – As an off spin bowler, he seems to be bowling too fast. He should have a session with the great Bishen Singh Bedi sometime to rejuvenate his bowling. His fast bowling has led to two 5 wides in yesterday's match. But he has really grown leaps and bounds in his batting.

 

Zaheer Khan – Bowling well has been the spear head of the Indian bowling attack. He hasn't done much wrong but has been a little slow in the field, being the oldest in the side, that seems to be his undoing.

 

RP Singh – came in for this game only and bowled really well. No complains.

 

Ishant Sharma – Running in a bad patch, Ishant is unable to threaten international batsmen with his bouncers, which are picked for boundaries. A rather disheartening fact is that he is not learning from his mistakes.

 

After all the critiques, I think this is what India should do in the next game.

 

  1. Get in Dinesh Karthik as the keeper.
  2. Keep Dhoni as the Batsman-Captain.
  3. Opening can be done either by Dinesh Karthik or Yusuf Pathan.
  4. Drop Rohit Sharma down the order, send in Yuvraj in at three followed by Raina.
  5. Harbhajan has to slow down his bowling and use his speed only as a surprise ball.
  6. Give Praveen Kumar a chance in place of Ishant Sharma, he has guile and can swing the ball both ways.

Now that the team is out of the tournament anyway, there is no risk in tinkering here and there. Your inputs are invited.

Monday, April 20, 2009

Wordle


This is a Wordle for my recent blogs, five of them to be precise. It does a count of words used in the blog and draws up a word cloud to show which word has been most used.



Head to www.wordle.net to get a word cloud for your writings. It is pretty self explanatory.

Friday, March 27, 2009

What animals among your desktop icons?

There will always be icons on a desktop, i.e. if you are a normal user. Some people go ahead and do stuff without any icons on their desktop, quick launch or start menu. These are the geeks. It is sad that they , in their pursuit of being efficient remove all signs of desktop icons.

These icons are not a random bunch of images just put in to the program. These icons create a brand image for that program. This is part of what I wanted to talk about here. I wanted to know what animals live among your icons on desktop or where ever you store your icons.

I have my RocketDock configured with my most used icons. And from among them are the following programs that use animals.


Firefox – Fox

Pidgin – Pigeon

GIMP – a Fox with a paintbrush in its mouth (or is it a dog?)

IrfanView – A red splattering of what looks like a cat.


These are the programs I am currently using more. But there are some very famous programs that have an animal in them. Specially in case of Open Source programs like Thunderbird, Songbird and definitely worth the mention is LINUX, whose mascot is a Penguin and many linux distributions have animals in their brand like SuSe which has a chameleon. BSD has the Devil, which cannot be said to be an animal.

Microsoft has few of the most boring icons; these as a rule try to depict what the program will do.

These are the icons I remember for now, will update this post once I find more. I will look stupid if I have missed some real important ones, but I leave it up to you guys to mention them here, with a link to the image.

As a departing thought, I consider Songbird to have one of the cutest icons ever!

Update: A few of my friends pointed out that MySQL has a Dolphin in its icon. Another says that all Mozilla S*** has animals in their icons. I agree.

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Am I Old?

"Everyday, more than three billion minutes are spent by computer users on Facebook" says once email forward, listing the 10 things that changed our lives. It listed Social Networking as one among them.
It has been true for a long time that the younger generation are quick on the uptake of new technologies. They use these things like Twitter, Facebook and MySpace and other similar technologies day in and day out.
Among the few technologies of my time were Personal websites, blogs, web search and email. We were champions of anything to do with these technologies. But, now I see myself stepping away from the Facebooks and Twitters. I just can't find the time. Maybe once in a month is too much time spent.
This begs the question, "Have I become old?" or rather "Have I grown out of the "younger generation?""
Maybe, maybe not.
A recent discovery by a BBC survey puts the onset of old age at 27 where as the peak being at 22. Scientifically, I am getting old.
On the other hand, One is as old as he thinks he is. I can do a lot of things that people of my age seldom do. This makes me feel younger too.
Old age is without a cure and an inevitable reality for most human beings. So I will go ahead and slow down my pace and catch up with the wisdom of my 28 years of life.

Friday, February 06, 2009

In Twos

A shoe was thrown at Mr. George W. Bush. The guy who did it became famous and so did the shoe and the entire exercise. So much so that another guy repeated this possible fad with the Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao.

There is a certain pop culture that seems to have surrounded this event. People rallying for these guys who threw the shoe at these leaders. Both the guys having landed in prison for committing this act and breaking some bones in the process.

In another part of the world, Airplane engine failures have resulted in miraculous crash landings not resulting in deaths. The Hudson river crash landing was quite iconic in the fact that a major airliner crashed in the water without getting anybody killed. The Captain of the flight Captain Chesley Sullenberger was hailed as a hero in these desperate economic times. Well, somewhere (Australia?) someone (Steve Bolle?) was taking notes.

It could be a coincidence but maybe History repeats itself in some way.

p.s: don't forget to click the links.

Thursday, January 01, 2009

URL Shortenings

Ever had a long long long URL that you had to send out to a friend on IM or email? It was so long that it stopped being a URL? A good example of these types of URL are shopping site URLs.

like this:
http://cgi.ebay.in/NEW-4-3-GPS-CAR-NAVIGATOR-HOLUX-NAV-55A-WITH-WARRANTY_W0QQitemZ380093271536QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_203?hash=item380093271536&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=66%3A1|65%3A1|39%3A1|240%3A1318

Phew! That was long. You might already know a few sites like www.tinyurl.com that shorten/make tiny your long URLs. But here is a comparison of five of them that I found from this link.

Here is a comparison. I've put my Google Reader Shared Items as a test link.

Test link: http://www.google.com/reader/shared/15393105146633867508

Resulting Short links:
(no. of characters excluding the 'http://')

http://tinyurl.com/8uu4rd (17)

http://is.gd/eloE (10)

http://bit.ly/jGb (10)

http://snipurl.com/9c2v5
(17)

http://cli.gs/GYgrnj (13)

looks like is.gd and bit.ly tie for the first position. Get more info by visiting the sites and reading the article linked.